Raptor Buckle, is it enough?

By

Staff

A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter aircraft assigned to the 18th Aggressor Squadron takes off from Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, Oct. 6, 2014, during RED FLAG-Alaska 15-1. RF-A is a series of Pacific Air Forces commander-directed field training exercises for U.S. and partner nation forces, providing combined offensive counter-air, interdiction, close air support and large force employment training in a simulated combat environment. (U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Joseph Swafford Jr./Released)

[HTML1]


CTOMS, a Canadian manufacturer
of high angle rescue equipment, just posted an interesting article on their blog in which they describe their in-house test of the JBC Corporation Raptor Buckle. The Raptor is an American-made competitor to the popular AustriAlpin Cobra buckle.

We’ve been doing a lot of pull tests and drop tests lately, validating the operating parameters of our TRACE Comprehensive Capability Micro Rope Systems.  During a day of testing, I thought I would pull some Raptor™ Buckles to destruction and measure peak forces, just out of curiosity.  We’ve been using Cobra Buckles on our X-Belts and M-Harnesses since the beginning and, keeping an open mind for alternative possibilities, I wanted to validate the Raptor personally.  There has been some controversy around them and I figured the best way to sort it out was to to see for myself.

The good news: the buckle withstood 1569 pounds of force before the frame broke. The buckling mechanism stayed intact, for what that’s worth. The bad news: that’s a quarter less than JBC’s own published rating of 2023 pounds. Keep in mind, that’s still plenty of retention unless you’re on one end of a 20ft dummy cord attached to one of these.

Source: CTOMS Blog privatebloggins.ca

nextpage